Teaching
practice set: Eliciting students’ ideas and adapting instruction (http://ambitiousscienceteaching.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Primer-Eliciting-Students-Ideas.pdf)
· With the goal to
change students thinking about a topic you must first start with finding out
what students know. To do this at the
start of a unit or topic an anchoring phenomenon where current student understanding
can be discovered through questioning. Then
general steps for that include there being an introduction, a student
hypothesis and then group/class explanation.
o Thinking about
this and next year I almost want to make my room a ship theme, where I am the
captain. As a captain everyone is
responsible for their own work and the crew/student rely on me as I rely on
them to make it through the year together successfully.
A
Discourse Primer for Science Teachers
· Productive
discourse must be facilitated as it is not what normally occurs in students’
lives. Steering students to answers will
get them to understand it in a way different that simple hearing it. Students talking can easily give insight to
those participating. To help all feel
comfortable talking a safe classroom must be established first and kept (students
should be encouraged to respectfully disagree when appropriate). Being tactful with it all a classroom environment
with frequent discourse is possible.
· IRE (“initiation-response-
evaluation” discussions) is common in classrooms and after having read about
direct instruction I am afraid is often what I do. For me I have a paper in the back of the room
saying 5-seconds as I know I can suck at providing wait time. Reading this I am wanting to add more of the
turn and talks as I can in classes to have students help each other.
Using
Interviews to Explore Student Ideas in Science
· To teach one must
first learn what students know, interviews work for this purpose. Direct questions may lead to recitation of “school-based
knowledge,” whereas putting questions in a context can get a deeper
understanding of a student’s understanding of a concept. Asking for
clarification may give an idea of what surrounding concepts on a topic students
are familiar with.
· I most recently
failed to ask for clarification for what students actually know about atoms,
when they mentioned they had already learned about them.
Getting
to student learning seemed to be the theme of this week’s reading, not the
teacher lecturing or students reciting.
It is not a goal of having students be able to answer basic questions
with school-based answers, but to have the understanding to explain topics. For
me entering into this next month and having to review for the EOC I am asking
myself about how to do it best.
Applicability
question/thought… I am thinking with students working in pairs to explain a
topics relations to Biology may allow students can in part reteach each other
as needed while allowing potential discourse.
Then in having students on different topics switching I may be able to
get some insight as to what may need to be retaught as a whole group.
Thank you for your post! I really appreciate how self aware and self reflective it is. I especially like your plan to incorporate these strategies into your review. Have you used this idea of “student experts” before in your classroom? I have had some success using these kinds of activities for smaller reviews by allowing students to choose which subjects they feel the most comfortable teaching. Giving them the choice seems to help increase their confidence. Aside from that, would students rotate through subjects like stations? Or switch off teaching? I look forward to hearing how it goes!
ReplyDelete